Ironically, the Freakonomics blog about economics appears to be having economic difficulty.
Freakonomics Needs Money!
Help save Freakonomics. They need money and can no longer afford to purchase stock photography. At least this is what I conclude based on today’s post, which appears to have borrowed a copyrighted image from another site without attribution or purchase. (I called the vendor, who reported no sale to anyone associated with Freakonomics in the last 30 days.) More on this breaking news below. But first:
Donate To Freakonomics!
For the month of August 2007, I’ll donate one third of the funds that I receive from the Amazon Honor System to Freakonomics so that they can afford to purchase stock photography. My donation to Freakonomics comes with a catch. Freakonomics will have to apologize on its blog for its past bad blogging practices.
I’ll donate another third to Hammond Community Library in Wisconsin, one of the victims of the Freakonomics copyjacking (bad hotlinking).
I’ll donate the final third to Legends of America. (More on Legends of America below.)
The suggested donation is $27.95, the list price for the Freakonomics book. Minimum donation is $1.00.
Apologies To Freakonomics
I would like to publicly apologize to Freakonomics. If my constant blogging about the bad blogging practices of Freakonomics has embarrassed anyone associated with Freakonomics, then I sincerely apologize.
As I have repeatedly stated, Freakonomics has a larger platform on the Internet than I do. The Freakonomics blog has a Technorati authority score of 1674, whereas erikjheels.com has an authority score of 147.
But with authority comes responsibility (or so I was taught in the Air Force). And having committed some copyright faux pas (faux pases?), Freakonomics has the responsibility, I believe, to further the conversation and educate others about the evils of copyright infringement and copyjacking. But since Freakonomics has exercised its right to remain silent, I’ll have to blog harder (about 11.204081 times harder, to be more precise) to get the message out.
Thanks To Freakonomics
I would also like to thank Freakonomics for not apologizing. They’ve given me great material to blog about. I frankly would have stopped blogging about this weeks ago if Freakonomics has said, “Oops, our bad.”
|
The Freakonomics Irony Scorecard |
|
|
Freakonomics is a book about economics. |
Copyright infringement and copyjacking are economic issues. |
|
Freakonomics has a lawyer editor. |
Copyright infringement and copyjacking are legal issues. |
|
The Freakonomics blog is a commercial blog that helps boost sales of the Freakonomics book. |
|
|
Freakonomics has been silent about its own transgressions. |
|
Freakonomics Smoking Gun?
Today, Freakonomics blogged about the oldest profession and included an image called paintedlady.jpg. I searched on iStockphoto.com but did not find the photo.
I searched Google images and did find the “painted lady” image.
The Google Images search page pointed to Rambling Bob.
Rambling Bob links the image to its source on Legends of America.
The Legends of America page includes a link for purchasing prints of the painted lady. The link goes to the Printroom.com store. In the Printroom.com store, I found the image in question (entitled “Soiled Dove“) with details about how to purchase print and electronic copies.
Plus a copyright notice saying that all rights are reserved.
There is also a contact form with Printroom.com’s phone number.
So I called Printroom.com. I spoke to a nice man named Tanner, who gave me Kathy’s phone number. (Printroom.com is a service provider for many stores, and Kathy is the proprietor of the Legends of America store.) I explained to Kathy that I have been blogging about this topic, and I asked Kathy if anyone from Freakonomics had purchased this image from them. She said that in the last 30 days, nobody from Freakonomics had purchased anything from her store. (I named all the Freakonomics individual and corporate team members.)
Kathy also added that she takes old images like these that are in the public domain, improves them by touching them up by hand, and sells them in her store. The original work is in the public domain. Kathy’s new and improved work is not.
So Kathy, like Freakonomics, makes her living off of selling copyrighted works. You can add that one to the irony scorecard.
